Evidence Based Homeopathy & Nanopharmacology for Respiratory Allergies

Yeah,,,,, it is wonderful....

Content was excellent but the transmission very poor. The sound kept cutting off even though I have a very high quality internet connection. At least there is a playback. Thanks.

The lecture was great, too bad about the sound that make the webinar very hard to understand.

A GREAT CHANCE TO LEARN FROM A LEADING HOMEOPATH STALWART. THE EFFICACY OF HOMOEOPATHY IN RESPIRATORY ALLERGIES IS HIGHLIGHTED ON UNIQUE EVIDENCE BASED EXPLANATION

Sadly the audio on the webinar was really awful. The audio was intermittent which was disappointing because the presenter was great and a well known homeopath. I hope to catch the replay and that the sound on it is much better!

Very bad sound.I stopped viewing after 30 min.

I disagree with much of what Ullman stated. 1. Nanoparticles: the idea propesed here is that the original substance, hidden somewhere in the water, is what produces the therapeutic effects. This is soooo wrong on so many leves. What about the original substances that have no therapeutic effect in their crude form, as Lycopodim for example. And what about the ones that are extremely poisonous in their crude form? He would probably state that the succussion is what turns the therapeutic action on. But how? By magic? Homeopaths must learn to be intellectually rigorous, otherwise will always be the butt of the sceptics' jokes. If one states that there is a silicon-base particle in the solution—that eventually becomes biologically active—do us all a favour and, please, and propose the physical nature of this action. 2. This latest idea that silicon pieces from the glass walls somehow combine with the succussed drug—while also hidden in the water—actually physically enter the cell membrane and other tissues—this is what the sceptics rightfully call pseudoscience. I have a degree in materials science engineering. Iris Bell, Dana Ullman et al have no understanding what nanotechnology is. At the scale of magnification below ten to the power of minus nine (10-9 ) the matter starts exhibiting strong quantum mechanical effects. This is what nanotechnology is all about. And this is how homeopathic drugs work too, in this realm! You can learn about the way biology behaves at this scale in the papers on photosynthesis, for example. Yes, the pharmaceutical industry, especially the cancer industry, is presently trying to exploit the various tiny participle for the delivery of their poisonous drugs directly to the target tissues. We should stay clear away from this. This is not nanotechnology. 3. The saddest part of Ullman's presentation is the fact that he doesn't understand the clinical value of an aggravation, which is derived directly from the Organon where it is termed 'the artificial disease.' Kent states that if an aggravation lasts for a long time, the case is incurable. Vithoulkas thinks Kent failed to wait a sufficient amount of times in some cases. I, personally, had severe aggravation for 2 weeks, which followed by a cure. Had I not being taught by Vithoulkas I would have forever ruined my case by taking something else! How sad, indeed for so many homeopaths to practice what Ullman describes here, ie, interrupting the remedy action (which he insist on calling 'healing crises', and that is not even a homeopathic term.) There is no cure without an aggravation. In an extremely high fever of an acute Bell case, the aggravation may only last a few minutes, moreover, if the symptoms are very violent the organism would not allow the aggravation to damage it, furthermore, the patient would not register it if her own symptoms are too severe. Vithoulkas and Kent, and so many modern-day Indian homeopaths all know and practice that. Here is a quote from Vithoulkas while responding to a homeopath who stated that he had ""never and an aggravation."" Vithoulkas: ""Maybe you never had a cure?""

The info was good, but the Q&A function didn't work when I tried it, and the sound quality was filled with echo and there were frequent drop outs in sound all together. I have submitted my question to homeopathic.com's contact, and hope I can receive an answer in this way.

Sound was not consistent. Words ad sentences were sometimes not heard.

The sound quality was poor. It kept breaking up. I hope a recorded version of this webinar will be available.

this was really useful as regarding the evidence , but little confused on part of using the specific allergens .no cases were shared , that is only dissapointing , rest was good

Audio n power point presentation..... Poor connection

sound not good

The content was interesting but it was hard to listen to because the sound kept coming and going.

Very Good presentation but there was issue with Audio quality

Dana Ullman is awesome and so interesting.

Love it very informative

technical difficulties, especially at the beginning